In order to receive full credit on your original post, you have to provide a brief summary of some aspect of at least one of the assigned readings AND some type of thoughtful interpretation about the reading. For example, you can connect the reading to your own life experience or work with children, or think about examples youve read about in other classes or the media. Posts that are just summarizing the readings will not receive full credit. Neither will posts about external sources/personal experiences that do not clearly connect back to the reading(s).
To receive full credit on your two replies, you must respond thoughtfully to another classmates post. You may choose to answer a question theyve posed, ask a follow-up question, share an example, or make some other connection that demonstrates that youve carefully read and thought about their post.
Your post will be graded on a scale of 0 to 2 points. You can view the rubric (see uploaded file named criteria). Your post must include an analysis of the reading (e.g., thoughtful question you have, connections with previous class content, other courses, personal experience, etc.). Summaries of the readings, without additional analysis, will not receive full credit.
You must also thoughtfully reply to two classmates’ posts. These will each be graded on a scale of 0-0.5 posts.
300 words for original post, 125 words for each reply.
The reading for this assignment is “Christian et al. (2015) – Influence of the neighborhood physical environment on early child health and development.pdf”
I also uploaded lecture slides, just want to give you a look about what’s going on in this class, they are not sources though
I’ll upload two classmates’ posts later